{"id":9316,"date":"2018-10-30T16:28:20","date_gmt":"2018-10-30T15:28:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/journal_article\/judicial-review-in-a-context-of-legal-indeterminacy-2\/"},"modified":"2018-10-30T16:28:20","modified_gmt":"2018-10-30T15:28:20","slug":"judicial-review-in-a-context-of-legal-indeterminacy-2","status":"publish","type":"journal_article","link":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/judicial-review-in-a-context-of-legal-indeterminacy-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Judicial Review in a Context of Legal Indeterminacy"},"content":{"rendered":"
Giulio Napolitano, Eduardo Jordao and Marco D Alberti discuss the topic of judicial review of administrative power. The scholars examine multi- farious aspects, such as the legal design of judicial review systems from a comparative perspective, legal indeterminacy, and the intensity of judicial review of administrative power.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Giulio Napolitano, Eduardo Jordao and Marco D Alberti discuss the topic of judicial review of administrative power. The scholars examine multi- farious aspects, such as the legal design of judicial review systems from a comparative perspective, legal indeterminacy, and the intensity of judicial review of administrative power.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n