{"id":9280,"date":"2017-10-12T20:02:50","date_gmt":"2017-10-12T18:02:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/journal_article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/"},"modified":"2017-10-12T20:02:50","modified_gmt":"2017-10-12T18:02:50","slug":"monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2","status":"publish","type":"journal_article","link":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Judicial Monism and Dualism. History and Perspectives"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"page\" title=\"Page 301\">\n<div class=\"layoutArea\">\n<div class=\"column\">\n<p>Currently, in some legal systems, the distinction between public law and private law has changed with respect to the past. An important indicator of this phenomenon concerns, in particular, the evolution of judicial dualism, both in binary legal systems and in those systems of unitary law. The analysis shows how developments arising subsequently to the formation of the binary model \u2014 that of judicial monism\/dualism \u2014 have cast much ambiguity and recently, evanescence, upon the distinction between jurisdictional systems. In this regard, the main factors explaining why different legal orders tend to move in the same direction are considered. Upon this perspective, the analysis also considers the further and expanding variable of judicial cooperation in the European area.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Currently, in some legal systems, the distinction between public law and private law has changed with respect to the past. An important indicator of this phenomenon concerns, in particular, the evolution of judicial dualism, both in binary legal systems and in those systems of unitary law. The analysis shows how developments arising subsequently to the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v19.14 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Judicial Monism and Dualism. History and Perspectives - IRPA<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Judicial Monism and Dualism. History and Perspectives - IRPA\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Currently, in some legal systems, the distinction between public law and private law has changed with respect to the past. An important indicator of this phenomenon concerns, in particular, the evolution of judicial dualism, both in binary legal systems and in those systems of unitary law. The analysis shows how developments arising subsequently to the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"IRPA\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/\",\"name\":\"Judicial Monism and Dualism. History and Perspectives - IRPA\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-10-12T18:02:50+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-12T18:02:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Judicial Monism and Dualism. History and Perspectives\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/\",\"name\":\"IRPA\",\"description\":\"Istituto di Ricerca sulla Pubblica Amministrazione\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Judicial Monism and Dualism. History and Perspectives - IRPA","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Judicial Monism and Dualism. History and Perspectives - IRPA","og_description":"Currently, in some legal systems, the distinction between public law and private law has changed with respect to the past. An important indicator of this phenomenon concerns, in particular, the evolution of judicial dualism, both in binary legal systems and in those systems of unitary law. The analysis shows how developments arising subsequently to the","og_url":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/","og_site_name":"IRPA","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/","url":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/","name":"Judicial Monism and Dualism. History and Perspectives - IRPA","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-10-12T18:02:50+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-12T18:02:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/article\/monismo-e-dualismo-giudiziario-storia-e-prospettive-2\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Judicial Monism and Dualism. History and Perspectives"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/","name":"IRPA","description":"Istituto di Ricerca sulla Pubblica Amministrazione","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/journal_article\/9280"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/journal_article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/journal_article"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.irpa.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9280"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}