<\/p>\n
In 1955, when Gianfranco Miglio discussed his essay Le origini della scienza dell\u2019amministrazione in Varenna<\/em>, the science of administration was a non-unitary discipline. Scientific reflections on administration were not scarce; however, the discipline was perceived as a \u201cscience of organization\u201d, parcelled out in several branches, or, at most, a way to inquire upon the \u201creal and concrete dimension\u201d of administration in a certain historical moment. Miglio gives a true \u201chistoricist\u201d perspective to his own work. He sketches the boundaries of a \u201cEuropean constitutional history\u201d, recalling the fortunes of <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" In 1955, when Gianfranco Miglio discussed his essay Le origini della scienza dell\u2019amministrazione in Varenna, the science of administration was a non-unitary discipline. Scientific reflections on administration were not scarce; however, the discipline was perceived as a \u201cscience of organization\u201d, parcelled out in several branches, or, at most, a way to inquire upon the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"template":"","acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
public administration between the Middle Ages and the 20th century and reconstructs the imperium<\/em>, political authority, professional administration and the \u201ctechnique\u201d of governing. As a manifesto against centrifugal forces that destroyed the science of administration, Miglio\u2019s essay is not a lesson on Cameralistics but, rather, a programme for future scholars.<\/p>\n